SWIP and Rwhois in the Real World
Daniel Senie
dts at senie.com
Wed Sep 7 04:12:44 UTC 2005
At 07:55 PM 9/6/2005, Andrew - Supernews wrote:
> >>>>> "william" == william(at)elan net <william at elan.net> writes:
>
> william> The above line is as clear as it gets (if the other two
> william> mentions that data is to be made available to public is not
> william> enough), so there this argument that rwhois should be made
> william> available only to ARIN is now against ARIN's policies and
> william> whoever you know who is still making it should be pointed to
> william> URL I listed.
>
>NetRange: 4.0.0.0 - 4.255.255.255
>ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.level3.net:4321
>
>% telnet rwhois.level3.net 4321
>Trying 209.244.1.179...
>telnet: connect to address 209.244.1.179: Operation timed out
>
>Doesn't seem to have made much difference yet...
Their rwhois seems to be terminally down. Can we reclaim 4/8 from them now?
Hopefully, ARIN will block them from acquiring more address space
(should they need it), pending functional SWIP or rwhois.
As the owner of a small provider, I found SWIPs far preferable to
rwhois, at least with the rwhois code I found available. I really
don't have a problem with folks choosing one or the other, but if
you're going to choose to use rwhois, then monitor the service and
make sure it's working.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list