mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)

Thu Jul 7 19:44:05 UTC 2005

>  I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going
>  away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I
>  misunderstood your point...

i think we are agreeing.

i think that any prediction that users will not use nats for v6 involves logic 
that can, at best, be called idealistic.  naive would be another term to 
consider.

  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net