AOL scomp

Fri Feb 25 11:12:54 UTC 2005

Robert Bonomi wrote:

> <snip>
>
>
>In actuality, *I* am not QUITE as draconian as suggested a couple of 
>paragraphs previously.  If I forward somebody's mail and get a complaint
>from the reciveing system about spam to that user, "originating" from my 
>system, that user *permanently* loses any forwarding privileges/capabilities.
>No appeal, no _notice_ no 'second chance', no nothing -- forwarding just 
>"stops working" for them. They _were_ told of this "down-side risk", with 
>regard to such an error, *before* the forwarding was enabled. They get to 
>live with the consequences.
>
>  
>
I suspect that sooner or later you will be amending your proccess to 
include a stated notice of understanding/whitelisting/no abuse 
complaints from both this users and this users forwarded-to system's 
administrators, before considering turninng on the forwarding hose.

>
>
>  
>