botnet reporting by AS - what about you?

• Previous message (by thread): botnet reporting by AS - what about you?
• Next message (by thread): botnet reporting by AS - what about you?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Aug 13, 2005, at 12:03 AM, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:

>
> Good suggestions for Gadi. ,-)
>
> - ferg
>
>
> -- "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow at mci.com> wrote:
>
> cool, among the 800k+ complaints we see a month (yes, 800k) there are
> quite a few completely useless ones :( Anything sent in as a  
> complaint has
> to have complete and useful information, else it's hard/impossible to
> action properly.
>
> It'd help if the format it was sent in was also machine  
> parseable :) With
> 800k+ complaints/month I'm not sure people want to spend time figuring
> each one out, a script/machine should be doing as much as possible.


As far as standard reporting goes, please be aware of the existence  
of the following:
http://www.shaftek.org/publications/drafts/abuse-report/

• Previous message (by thread): botnet reporting by AS - what about you?
• Next message (by thread): botnet reporting by AS - what about you?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]