Fw: Internet email performance study
aljuhani
info at riyadmail.com
Thu Apr 28 21:59:27 UTC 2005
Hi.
Sorry there was a mistake in my previous post
the subnet listed is 218.0.0.0/8 is not yours.
thanks
aljuhani
----- Original Message -----
From: "aljuhani" <info at riyadmail.com>
To: <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 00:53
Subject: Re: Internet email performance study
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 23:42, Robert Beverly" <rbeverly at rbeverly.net>
>
> ......snip
> > Yes, our SMTP greetings are valid and up to spec. Again, it's the
> > non-deterministic loss that we're most concerned about. If there
> > were a problem with the SMTP exchange, we would see our emails
> > always rejected (for instance). Our measurement study only includes
> > emails that were successfully delivered (indicated by a complete
> > series of successful status codes returned during SMTP exchange).
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > rob
>
> Hi,
>
> Perhaps this explains it.
>
> http://www.albury.net.au/netstatus/derouted.html
>
> BTW your subnet (18.0.0.0/8) is listed there as well.
>
> Regards,
>
> aljuhani
More information about the NANOG
mailing list