[nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update

Thu Sep 23 23:27:53 UTC 2004

Note that draft-daigle-rfc954bis-01.txt was approved and is
sitting in the RFC Editor's queue.  It removes all of the policy
language in RFC 954, but is otherwise the same (and it
will likewise be issued as a Draft Standard, the current
status of RFC 954).
			regards,
				Ted Hardie


At 6:00 PM -0400 9/23/04, Joe Abley wrote:
>On 23 Sep 2004, at 16:36, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>
>>http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php
>>
>>There you go.  They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954.
>
>RFC 954 is a description of how one whois service, "running on the 
>SRI-NIC machine (26.0.0.73 or 10.0.0.51)". How can any other whois 
>service be in violation of that?
>
>
>Joe