BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI

Sun Nov 28 19:18:15 UTC 2004

Then I think that needs to be addressed at the RIPE level.  ARIN certainly
made me prove that I had a unique routing policy and multiple peering
connections.  They wanted letters from the ISPs involved stating that yes,
I had a peering (or transit) relationship with them.

Owen

--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:14 PM +0100 Cliff Albert <cliff at oisec.net> 
wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:56:31AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> > As I also stated in my last post (which you snipped out, and is pretty
>> > relevant) is that the handing out of ASN's should be harder. Currently
>> > ASN's are given to every silly dude that says 'i want multihoming'.
>> >
>> This simply isn't true.  It was true several years ago, but, is not true
>> now.  (At least for ARIN.  I don't know what the policies are elsewhere).
>
> I am looking from a RIPE point of view. Lately I see ISPs popping out of
> the ground requesting ASNs and having actually only 1 upstream (there
> are 2 upstreams in the routing database, but in the real world there is
> only 1 upstream).
>
> --
> Cliff Albert <cliff at oisec.net>

-- 
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20041128/4938e559/attachment.sig>