The Cidr Report
Joe Provo
nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net
Sat Nov 13 13:44:48 UTC 2004
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 03:31:26AM +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
[snip]
> Of these listed 4 are cable companies, is there something in the cable
> modem networking that requires deaggregated routes beyond their borders?
No, for the general statement about 'cable modem networking'.
> Is the problem that they might have seperate 'networks' for their regional
> parts and leak more specifics for these parts along with 'backup' routes
> via aggregates?
This is trivial to do only as far as your $s carry. Aggregate draws
the traffic, then NO_EXPORT-tagged longest-match carries the
regionalized traffic. Folks do this as a 'best exit' approach between
peer netwworks all the time. If you are suggesting disjoint, unconnected
islands, then they should be separate ASNs for sane paths; see charter's
islands, the pre-271 refleif ILEC LATA-bound islands, etc.
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
More information about the NANOG
mailing list