Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ?

Alexander Hagen alexander at etheric.net
Sun Apr 25 13:06:49 UTC 2004


It is a great box. But I need BGP. I notice Cisco does not support 7505
with Software Advisor but does 7507 whats the deal with that ?

Alexander Hagen
Etheric Networks Incorporated, A California Corporation
527 Sixth Street No 371261
Montara CA 94037
Main Line: (650)-728-3375
Direct Line: (650) 728-3086
Cell: (650) 740-0650 (Does not work at our office in Montara)
Home: (Emgcy or weekends) 650-728-5820
fax: (650) 240-1750
http://www.etheric.net

-----Original Message-----
From: sthaug at nethelp.no [mailto:sthaug at nethelp.no] 
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 6:04 AM
To: alexander at etheric.net
Cc: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200
orother vendor ?

> Yes. I've been looking at it and a 7505 with a 3550 behind it seems
the
> way to go for our type of operation. 
> 
> As a cost cutting alternative - has anyone played with the 2900 XL
> series using sub interfaces to turn them into virtual router ports ?
or
> vlan groups ?
> Is it better to just buy a 3550 ?

If you're only doing basic Ethernet-Ethernet routing, and don't need
a full routing table, it's quite possible that the 3550 will perform
better than either the 6000/Sup1A or the 7505. You might also consider
a 3750, which handles a large number of SVIs better than the 3550.

(Yes, I'm seriously suggesting using the 3550 or 3750 alone.)

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no




More information about the NANOG mailing list