Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ?
Alexander Hagen
alexander at etheric.net
Sun Apr 25 12:41:30 UTC 2004
Yes. I've been looking at it and a 7505 with a 3550 behind it seems the
way to go for our type of operation.
As a cost cutting alternative - has anyone played with the 2900 XL
series using sub interfaces to turn them into virtual router ports ? or
vlan groups ?
Is it better to just buy a 3550 ?
Alexander Hagen
Etheric Networks Incorporated, A California Corporation
527 Sixth Street No 371261
Montara CA 94037
Main Line: (650)-728-3375
Direct Line: (650) 728-3086
Cell: (650) 740-0650 (Does not work at our office in Montara)
Home: (Emgcy or weekends) 650-728-5820
fax: (650) 240-1750
http://www.etheric.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swmike at swm.pp.se]
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 5:09 AM
To: Alexander Hagen
Cc: 'Robert E. Seastrom'; 'Tom (UnitedLayer)'; nanog at merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200
or other vendor ?
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Alexander Hagen wrote:
> 1) Catalyst 6006 w/ CATALYST 6000 SUPERVISOR ENGINE 1-A, 2GE, PLUS
MSFC
> & PFC
Yuck. Unless you have very few flows you do not want to use MSFC1/PFC1.
This platform would be good for a file server with few but highspeed
flows.
> This system costs somewhere around 1300.00 more than a:
> Cisco 7505 w RSP4 256 Plus (2) VIP 2-50/128 and 3 PA-FE-TX
>
> Obviously the Catalyst is a better unit. But will it be as "burned in"
> and robust as the venerable 7505 ?
The 7505 will probably handle lots of flows massively better than the
SUP1A.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the NANOG
mailing list