Anyone from AT&T here? (AT&T bogus DNSBL answers)

Mon Apr 19 20:04:54 UTC 2004

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:45:19 PDT, just me said:
> 
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote:
> 
>   After all, people who build DNS infrastructure intend it to be
>   used to for generic DNS translations, not generic database
>   lookups.
> 
> Wait. What's the difference? I must have missed something.

LDAP is on port 389. ;)

DNS is intended for "give me the A record for the hostname FOO".

LDAP is a more proper tool for "Give me the list of hosts that user
Q-Froob is allowed to post mail from on Tuesdays after 5PM".

Unfortunately, some of the anti-spam proposals look more like the
latter than the former....

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20040419/5822bc9a/attachment.sig>