Verisign Responds
Crist Clark
crist.clark at globalstar.com
Tue Sep 23 18:25:35 UTC 2003
bmanning at karoshi.com wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 bmanning at karoshi.com wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dave Stewart wrote:
> > > > > Courts are likely to support the position that Verisign has control of .net
> > > > > and .com and can do pretty much anything they want with it.
> > > > ISC has made root-delegation-only the default behaviour in the new bind,
> > > > how about drafting up an RFC making it an absolute default requirement for
> > > > all DNS?
> > > That would be making a fundamental change to the DNS
> > > to make wildcards illegal anywhere. Is that what you
> > > want?
> >
> > no it wouldnt. it would ust make wildcards illegal in top level domains,
> > not subdomains.
> >
> > -Dan
>
> really? and how would that work? (read be enforced...)
The same way all RFCs and Standards are enforced, by the IETF Delta
Squad Elite Stormtrooper Interdiction Unit Strike Force.
--
Crist J. Clark crist.clark at globalstar.com
Globalstar Communications (408) 933-4387
More information about the NANOG
mailing list