anycast (Re: .ORG problems this evening)
Patrick
patrick at stealthgeeks.net
Mon Sep 22 22:40:57 UTC 2003
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, David G. Andersen wrote:
> > Yes, I hope that UltraDNS implements something like this, if they have not
> > already. It's still not a guarantee that things will get withdrawn -- or be
> > reachable, even if working but not withdrawn -- in case of a problem. That
> > still leaves the DNS for a gTLD at risk for a single point of failure.
>
> The whole problem with only listing two anycast servers is that
> you leave yourself vulnerable to other kinds of faults. Your
> upstream ISP fat-fingers "ip route 64.94.110.11 null0" and
> accidentally blitzes the netblock from which the anycast servers
> are announced. A router somewhere between customers and the
> anycast servers stops forwarding traffic, or starts corrupting
> transit data, without interrupting its route processing.
> packet filters get misconfigured..
That's a good reason to make sure that you are anycasting from at least
two disparate netblocks, isn't it?. :-)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell
Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
More information about the NANOG
mailing list