APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA

Mon Mar 17 06:42:12 UTC 2003

On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:31:08 EST, Jared Mauch said:

> 	When you get a /8, you expect it to be fully usable.  The
> APNIC posture here seems to make sense to me that its an issue
> that needs to be resolved.  using one of the other currently
> reserved /8's while that issue plays out seems quite logical
> to me.

I suppose IANA *could* refund 1/2**16'th of the price paid by APNIC.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20030317/3459ac83/attachment.sig>