Jared Mauch wrote: > > While the issue on the surface appears to be fairly pety, the > 223/8 block was assigned to a RIR. 223.255.255/24 is reserved per rfc. And this is why my question. RFC 3330 states that 223.255.255/24 can be assigned to a RIR. What gives one RFC weight over another? Is it an issue of RFC type or obsoletion status? -Jack