Vulnerbilities of Interconnection
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.Nether.net
Fri Sep 6 18:20:28 UTC 2002
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:55:40PM -0400, batz wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote:
> :would be difficult to reach. I'd have to run a model to be sure, but
> :every one of the major seven have rerouting methodologies that would
> :recover from the loss. And I don't think they exclusively peer at
>
> ASN's to "fail", then see who is still connected, but we are
> still dealing with connectivity relatve to us and our peers,
> even 5+ AS-hops away.
>
> I would imagine this is one of the tasks CAIDA.org is probably
> working on, as it seems to fall within their mission.
Coming up with the as interconnection data is actaully fairly
easy if you parse route-views data. This obviously doesn't cover
every possible interconnection that exists but it does provide
a large swath of data to review for the interconnection
postulation.
Looking at that data, (this is an old snapshot) the top ten
networks are: (in #10->#1 order)
conn ASN
----+----
161 3356
229 1
242 2914
248 209
274 6461
277 3561
295 3549
328 7018
484 701
493 1239
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list