Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks?

Tue Dec 10 17:27:47 UTC 2002

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 17:03, Bryan Bradsby wrote:
> 
> > Check out www.antispews.org
> > -kyle
> 
> There are two SPEWS lists.
> 
> SPEWS[1] lists direct spam sources as accurately as /32

Which is the list that our corporate servers and my home lan ended up
on, despite never having sent direct spam

> SPEWS[2] includes SPEWS[1] plus collatteral damage.

Which was the rest of our address range and that of my home ISP

> to clarify, nothing more.

The intent of the double spews listing is good, but it isn't adhered to
in practice.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20021210/f3dd05a1/attachment.sig>