Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs?

• Previous message (by thread): Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs?
• Next message (by thread): introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <HGEEKCPKMCLEIOHFGKCNOEPLCBAA.nigel at forever-networks.com>, "Nigel Cl
arke" writes:
>
>Start now, do whatever it takes.
>
>Amongst the paperwork passed to congress, RIAA must have indicated where
>it's hackers would work from. Why not start there?
>

I assume you're talking about the Berman bill -- for the full text, see
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c107:1:./temp/~c107Pidyhy::
(it's not law yet).  Note in particular that although they have to 
notify the Attorney-General of the technologies they intend to use, 
the bill doesn't say anything about IP addresses.  Note also that the 
technology list is confidential.

Actually, the entire text is pretty appalling -- but read it for 
yourself.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com ("Firewalls" book)

• Previous message (by thread): Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs?
• Next message (by thread): introducer trust model, Was: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]