CAR

Mathew Lodge mathew at cplane.com
Thu Apr 18 17:23:21 UTC 2002


At 11:20 AM 4/18/2002 -0500, Ken Yeo wrote:
>-For UDP based audio/video trafffics, if the applications use RTSP and
>H.323, RTCP/H.245 will signal the sender to slowdown the transmission if the
>receiver lost packets.

No, that won't happen. Much real-time voice and video traffic is constant 
bit-rate, though there are CODECs that offer variable bit rates within an 
envelope of min/max bit rates. When packet loss is encountered, the 
equipment will usually try error concealment to deal with the lost data -- 
how sophisticated this is depends on the equipment. Re-sending the lost 
data is pointless because it will arrive too late.

More importantly, the sender will not slow down its transmission. It can't 
-- at any instant, there's a fixed amount of bandwidth required to carry 
the real-time voice and video, and there's no way to magically use less 
bandwidth. Buffering options are limited because the stream is real time 
and end-to-end latency must be bounded. And if the required bandwidth of 
the stream is greater than the available bandwidth over a long period of 
time (long in this case means seconds), no amount of buffering can help 
you. You need to abandon real-time and switch to a store-and-forward paradigm.

For example, a G.729a encoded real-time voice call requires 8Kbit/sec 
constant bit rate (excluding IP and RTP packet headers). If it can't get 
8Kbit/sec, the user gets crappy voice quality.

Some streaming systems (non real-time -- the content is stored for 
on-demand viewing) encode the video/audio at several different data rates 
and try to guess the available bandwidth for a customer's connection. This 
process typically happens at the start of the streaming session, However, 
automatically switching to a lower rate later is hard to do, so it's rare 
to see it implemented. But none of this can be done for real-time voice or 
video.

>Did I miss anything? How about UDP traffics that are not using RTSP/H.323?

H.323 is all about call signalling. It doesn't have anything to do with 
congestion management. Also, I think you mean H.323 (optionally including 
H.245) paired up with RTP -- this is the usual combination for VoIP calls. 
RTSP is typically used for streamed content.

Other real-time UDP protocols (protocols used by games such as Half Life, 
for example) typically use the same kind of concepts and techniques that 
are in RTSP to detect packet loss so that they can conceal it or react in 
some other way. But if they're carrying a real-time service that has 
minimum bandwidth requirements, then there's no way for the sender to slow 
down.

Cheers,

Mathew



| Mathew Lodge                 | mathew at cplane.com     |
| Director, Product Management | Ph: +1 408 789 4068   |
| CPLANE, Inc.                 | http://www.cplane.com | 




More information about the NANOG mailing list