once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user

Vadim Antonov avg at exigengroup.com
Mon Sep 10 05:10:04 UTC 2001




On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Doug Clements wrote:
> 
> You want h.323, then don't do NAT. This is very simple, and this thread has
> gone on long enough.

Or get an H.323 gateway which combines NAT functions and H.323
"switchboard" (i.e. CTI, conference control, etc).  My previous employer
(Genesys, now part of Alcatel) makes one.
 
--vadim




More information about the NANOG mailing list