Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user ...

Fri Sep 7 01:31:17 UTC 2001

* Roeland Meyer <rmeyer at mhsc.com> [20010906 18:16]:
> if you are doing one:one NAT then why do NAT at all?

To ease a renumbering transition.

I'll keep out of the rest of the thread..

-jr

----
Josh Richards <jrichard@{ geekresearch.com, cubicle.net }> [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
Geek Research, LLC - San Luis Obispo, CA - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
KG6CYK - IP/Unix/telecom/knowledge/coffee/security/crypto/business/geek