Digital Island sponsors DoS attempt?

Sat Oct 27 00:34:53 UTC 2001

On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:57:49 CDT, "Quibell, Marc" said:
> I don't believe I have it backwards, since RFC1191, the one you quoted,
> states:

Oh.. What you originally said was:

> off ICMP routing. And no I do not believe it is used across the internet,
> and if it does, it is probably hindering performance since it's probably
> using a lower mtu than is allowed, such as 576 or smaller. It would also

Which I read as "and if it (PMTUd) *is* used, it is probably hindering
performance".  If what you meant was "if it isn't used, you're stuck with
576, which hinders performance", that that is quite correct...

> I imagine this'll all change though whenever IPv6 comes about since the min.
> MTU size will be (approx.) 1200. As another poster stated, IPv6 requires
> PMTU, so this could become a nasty little problem.

That other poster was me too... Unless I'm confused... ;)

Hopefully we'll get lucky and the clue level required to deploy IPv6 will be
high enough that people will get the obvious stuff right. ;)
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20011026/32da9f3b/attachment.sig>