Is this normal?

Wed Jun 27 15:37:53 UTC 2001

On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:19:08 PDT, Scott Francis said:

> ugh. you have just raised the skeleton of one of the top 3 most popular
> religious wars in this forum. There is no consensus on this. I personally
> think it's bad form, but as these addresses are unlikely to appear in anyth=
> ing
> other than a traceroute, it's probably not hurting anything.

It also hoses PMTU Discovery if your router does RFC1918 ingress filtering
and one of the 10.x.x.x router addresses sends back a 'must fragment'.

But hey, we all knew that. ;)
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20010627/3e82b162/attachment.sig>