UUNET peering policy
john heasley
heas at shrubbery.net
Sun Jan 14 19:00:08 UTC 2001
Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:24:32AM -0800, Paul Vixie:
>
> sean at donelan.com (Sean Donelan) writes:
>
> ...another stunningly well researched, accurate and articulate article,
> including the following:
>
> > ... The imbalance issue has come up a few more times with other
> > providers such as PSI, Abovenet and others.
>
> To the best of my knowledge, AboveNet has never insisted on any particular
> traffic balance with any of our peers. Send to us 10:1, 1:10, 1:1, whatever.
> Any traffic coming or going over a peering connection is to or from one of
> AboveNet's customers, which means we're paid (by that customer) to deliver it.
> (Any other policy amounts to wanting to be paid twice for the same packet.)
yes! hopefully those who insist upon particular ratios groked that.
> Of course I can't commend on PSI or any of the other companies Sean mentioned.
> --
> Paul Vixie <Paul.Vixie at MMFN.COM>
> CTO and SVP, MFN (NASDAQ: MFNX)
>
> AboveNet, PAIX, and MIBH are subsidiaries of Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list