rfc 1918?

bill manning bmanning at localhost.localdomain
Fri Feb 23 19:49:32 UTC 2001


SMcGrath at dhhs.state.nh.us wrote:
> 
> Agreed Valdis,
> 
> Our upstream's use 1918 addresses internally  so that 1918 addresses are
> constantly bouncing off our filters
> we have an aggressive egress filter which makes sure no 1918's leak and
> pollute the internet ;-} and filtering on core routers is a suboptimal
> solution RFC 1819 addresses (10 points to the person who knows the
> predecessor)  NEED to be filtered at the border IMHO.
> 
> Scott
> 

AS long as you are filtering, could you -PLEASE- add the SMTP filter to
prevent email w/ RFC 1918 addresses in the headers from leaking out of
your networks?

RFC 1597.

--bill




More information about the NANOG mailing list