MCI WorldCom fiber cut in White Plains, NY
William Allen Simpson
wsimpson at greendragon.com
Sun Oct 10 03:49:45 UTC 1999
(Chuckle) When I first started looking into SONet back in'92, and later
with the Milan (Michigan) cut that took out so many "redundant" paths,
I learned that the "redundant" "ring" part of SONet was "intended" to be
preventative against an electronics failure, so that a single transceiver
failure won't kill the circuit. This is the same reason that they provision
"Automatic Protection Switching" (APS). But the two paths on the ring (and
the APS circuits) are usually both in the same fiber bundle.
For a educational network I was consulting on, they actually ran the pair of
bundles between buildings in two liner sleeves within a single duct. Saved
on right of way. So, even when you have a firm contract and circuits
specified, and it looks like a ring on paper, you have no way of knowning
that they actually gave you geographically diverse paths, without walking
the couple of hundred miles and inspecting them yourself.
APS is really a useless feature. Even when you get the contract to say there
are diverse paths, they will later groom the circuits to put them in the
same bundle.
Paul A Vixie wrote:
> why pay the complexity and cost overhead of SONET if you're not building rings?
WSimpson at UMich.edu
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
More information about the NANOG
mailing list