RFC1712 - is anyone actually using GPOS RR's ?
Andrew Brown
twofsonet at graffiti.com
Mon Nov 15 14:50:37 UTC 1999
>As subject says, is anyone actually using these ?
i don't think so. it's still in "experimental" status, and the bind
code has only this to say about it:
include/arpa/nameser.h: ns_t_gpos = 27, /* Geographical position (withdrawn). */
include/arpa/nameser_compat.h:#define T_GPOS ns_t_gpos
lib/resolv/res_debug.c: {ns_t_gpos, "GPOS", "geographical position (withdrawn)"},
so i don't think anyone ever bothered with it at all.
>We were thinking of adding this to our automated dns scripts ... but if
>nobody actually uses them, we don't want to spend time on it ...
use LOC (rfc1876) instead. it's more or less the same, but with more
info.
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior at daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet at graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
andrew at crossbar.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
More information about the NANOG
mailing list