BGP Blowup?

Jesper Skriver jesper at skriver.dk
Mon Dec 13 17:24:03 UTC 1999


On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 08:59:59AM -0800, Tim Wolfe wrote:
> 
> Being somewhat of a paranoid body, I have all my BGP peers currently set for
> max-prefix of 75000.  On Friday, my Sprint peer (usually around 67k)
> exceeded that number and we stopped the session.  This in itself is not a
> big deal, but looking at http://www.telstra.net/ops/bgptable.html I notice
> that they suck a large influx in the table at a similar time..  Did anyone
> else see something similar?  If so, what peers did you see this from?  Here
> is the log for my incident in question..
> [snip]
> Dec 10 17:39:39  No. of prefix received from SPRINTROUTER: 75001 exceed limit 75000
> 
> My session was disabled so I'm not sure how much bigger their table got. 
> The only reason I bring this up here instead of directly to Sprint is that
> the data on the Telestra page appears to point the finger at this being a
> multi-provider incident, and I haven't heard anything on this list or others
> regarding the situation..

None of our full routing sessions show this ...

x.x.x.x         4     1 1288729   35709  3747858    0    0 1w4d     66566
x.x.x.x         4  1239 1392203   36716  3747606    0    0 1w1d     66970
x.x.x.x         4  3561   91930    1560   392057    0    0 06:19:18 66647

/Jesper

-- 
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk
Work:    Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
Private: Geek            @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)

One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.




More information about the NANOG mailing list