Acceptable Use, WAS: Re: OUTAGE: MCI/Worldcom frame-relay , network
Mike Heller
mikeh at earthweb.com
Tue Aug 10 12:36:17 UTC 1999
>From the Nanog website:
".....Establish a forum for the exchange of technical information"
I agree that we should use restraint with posts like "my line is
up" and "my line is down". This however, IS the place to discuss routers and
switches and software pertinant to our everyday practices.
Don't get me wrong, I still love to find out that a provider of mine is
having trouble on the west coast long before their call center has gotten
word of it.
mike
Michael Heller
Sr. Systems Engineer
Earthweb, Inc.
212.448.4175
mikeh at earthweb.com
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
>
> > I do not believe NANOG is appropriate for real time operational
> > issues.
>
> Let me see here .... What Can we not do on nanog:
>
> We can't talk about cisco configuration issues as they are discussed
> on cisco-nsp or something like that.
>
> We can't talk about Routing Protocols - they belong on some other list
> somewhere.
>
> We can not talk about outages affecting most all of our customers - as
> this isn't the appropriate forum.
>
> I could go on and on and on....
>
> Is there ANY topic which is ok to discuss on the nanog list?
>
>
> - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc at imach.com) KD7EHZ
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com
> Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list