And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad
David Stoddard
dgs at us.net
Tue Sep 22 15:22:32 UTC 1998
Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
> In article <199809182139.RAA10174 at us.net>, David Stoddard <dgs at us.net> wrote:
> > There is more to this than meets the eye -- 28.8K is asynchronous
> > and has start and stop bits for every byte, so there are a maximum
> > of 2880 bytes/sec available over 28.8K. Then there is the issue
>
> Almost every modem supports V42 error correction, which makes the modems
> speak a sort of synchronous with each other (actually data is transmitted
> in blocks with a start-of-block and end-of-block marker, and a checksum).
> That gets you 8 bits in a bith minus some negligeble V42 overhead.
> So an 28k8 modem can actually transfer almost 3.6 Kbytes/sec.
> Because of the block-oriented approach you do get a bit higher latency
> on interactive connections, which is why gamers often turn of V42.
As long as we are being specific about this, I omitted data
compression too, which has a real effect on the data transfer rate
as well. I also omitted 56K modems, ISDN dial-up, and other aspects
of dial-up communications (like MPP). The point I was trying to
make was not to disassemble 28.8K modem protocols, but to point
out the fallacy in believing that a T1 line can only support
53 modems.
As far as the start and stop bit issues go, they are controlled in
the UART on the PC serial port, not the modem. Regardless of how
the modem encodes and transmits data over the wire, the start and
stop bits remain in the asynchronous serial protocol on PCs -- years
ago, PC terminal programs used to let you control the number of start
and stop bits you used to communicate with a device. The fact that
DCE/DTE rates are usually higher that the actual speed of the modem
connection negates some of the effect of start and stop bits, but
they do exist.
For modem to modem communications, start and stop bits were used
up through 2400 baud when one bit = one tone. The method of one
bit = one tone was dropped for other forms of encoding when modems
started supporting connection speeds in excess of 2400 baud. While
the 8000 bit/sec sampling rate of POTS lines can theoretically
support up to 4000 Hz bandwidth, it is technically impossible to
get this (reliably) out of the analog phone system. 28.8K modems
need at least 3200 Hz of bandwidth on a POTS line to support 28.8K.
All said, I still stand by my comment that 53 modems per T1 is
ludicrous.
Dave Stoddard
dgs at us.net
More information about the NANOG
mailing list