IRR/RADB updates vs. ANS?
Hank Nussbacher
hank at ibm.net.il
Tue Nov 10 07:36:08 UTC 1998
At 10:48 PM 11/9/98 -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
>On Mon, 9 Nov 1998 jprovo at ma.ultranet.com wrote:
>
>> When last I dealt with this matter (96), ANS happily listens to
>> minor IRR policy stuff in a timely (hours?) fashion, but still
>> manually configured what they considered a "move" from AS to AS.
>
>When FDT got it's CIDR block from ARIN several months ago, I had to call
>ANS and complain that they were ignoring my entry in radb.ra.net. Seemed
>awfully primitive.
Ditto. Took a number of emails to get ANS to hear a multihomed blocked from
both AS's simultaneously. Seemed like a manual procedure to get it right.
-Hank
>
>---dont't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
> Jon Lewis <jlewis at fdt.net> | Spammers will be winnuked or
> Network Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes
> Florida Digital Turnpike | to get the job done.
>______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key________
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list