Lawsuit threat against RBL users
Stephen Stuart
stuart at tech.org
Fri Dec 4 17:45:50 UTC 1998
> Hasn't the operational value of this discussion been exhausted?
Yes; in fact, a separate list was created to handle it:
> Message-ID: <19981120161543.A21268 at puck.nether.net>
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 16:15:43 -0500
> From: Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net>
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> Subject: rbl-discuss at puck.nether.net
> Reply-To: rbl-discuss at puck.nether.net
>
>
> new mailing list out there.
>
> rbl-discuss at puck.nether.net
>
> for discussion of rbl type filtering, consequences, etc.
>
> to get on:
>
> send mail to rbl-discuss-request at puck.nether.net
>
> subject: subscribe
>
> to get off:
>
> (insert pun here)
>
> send mail to rbl-discuss-request at puck.nether.net
>
> subject: unsubscribe
>
> --
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from
> jared at puck.nether.net
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/
Will everyone who wants to keep the RBL discussion alive *please* go
there?
Stephen
More information about the NANOG
mailing list