oh, for goodness' sake.
Dave Crocker
dcrocker at brandenburg.com
Wed Apr 8 19:07:43 UTC 1998
At 07:41 AM 4/8/98 +0800, David R. Conrad wrote:
>>I think that placing such critical domain references under .INT is a
>>reasonable idea.
>
>I suspect this could be controversial given .INT is supposed to be
>administered by the ITU... :-)
>
>Since we're already saddled with .arpa and it is already used for
>(arguably) critical infrastructure goop, why not use it?
I wasn't trying to argue in favor of .INT, merely in favor of a rigorous
definition of who gets one of these ops-related registrations and who doesn't.
d/
________________________________________________________________________
Dave Crocker Brandenburg Consulting +1 408 246 8253
dcrocker at brandenburg.com 675 Spruce Drive (f) +1 408 249 6205
www.brandenburg.com Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
More information about the NANOG
mailing list