Spam Control Considered Harmful
J.D. Falk
jdfalk at priori.net
Tue Oct 28 19:15:24 UTC 1997
On Oct 28, Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
> Some of them are esentially centralsied methods of controlling Internet
> content. Paul's anti-spam feed for instance prevents users of some
> providers from seeing spam. The user has no choice; they cannot opt to
> receive spam other than by switching to another provider. Even worse:
> they may not even be aware that they are "missing" some content.
Users should be aware if their ISP is blocking something,
no matter what it is. However, that's not a technical or
operational issue...I'm not sure what category it is.
*********************************************************
J.D. Falk voice: +1-650-482-2840
Supervisor, Network Operations fax: +1-650-482-2844
PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net
"The People You Know. The People You Trust."
*********************************************************
More information about the NANOG
mailing list