AGIS/DIGEX
Neil J. McRae
neil at easynet.net
Wed Oct 30 15:30:30 UTC 1996
On Wed, 30 Oct 1996 08:26:58 -0600 (CST)
alan at mindvision.com (Alan Hannan) alleged:
> You are assuming that the goal of all internet service providers
> is to have the best connectivity possible, without respect for
> cost, administrative overhead, or market strategy.
True :-)
>
> If X is really really big, and Y is really really small, then
> perhaps it would benefit X to have Y as a paying customer instead
> of as a peer.
>
> The word peer implies equals, as it has so long been repeated.
>
> If provider X is missing 0.01% of the market share, and provider Y
> is missing 20% of the market share, who will be more upset, I
> ask..
>
Well I feel that the 2 providers mentioned are both reasonably sized enough
to peer with each other, judging a peering policy on how many NAP's
one is connected to is, in my opinion, the policy of the mad.
Neil.
--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. E A S Y N E T G R O U P P L C
neil at EASYNET.NET NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor)
Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list