topological closeness....
Miguel A.L. Paraz
map at iphil.net
Thu May 16 13:14:51 UTC 1996
Hello,
Gopi K Garge wrote:
> IMHO, in the context of the AP region, I guess we are overlooking the
> user perspective - locally available "Internet" content. Barring
> .au, .sg, .kr, .hk (?), .jp and .tw, I do not see any major effort
> around to provide locally, content that is available in the US
> be it the GNU archive, the WU archive or one-of-those Beatles
> song and lyrics archive - result - good amount of traffic to the
> US.
With limited bandwidth, updating these archives would be slow,
and, you wouldn't know yet if there are enough people accessing
these to justify getting a mirror.
Caching should help getting commonly requested information faster.
> When one sees such traffic trends, why would an ISP even think in
> terms of investing in a link to a place other than the US - the cost
> permitting ?
In the long term, as the Internet becomes more common, regional content
will become more important, IMHO. So develop the local content -
and the local infrastructure - and regional intranets, and virtual
private networks - will come in.
--
miguel a.l. paraz <map at iphil.net> iphil communications, makati city,
tech problems, to <support at iphil.net> philippines.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list