Worldly Thoughts - Regionalizing Peering
John Curran
jcurran at bbnplanet.com
Sun May 12 13:36:31 UTC 1996
At 8:24 PM 5/11/96, Alan Hannan wrote:
> The model scales well, imho. Regionalize your network into
> pieces. Apply each of the pieces into 1 or more proximities to a
> NAP|MAE.
Been there, done that.... I've already stated my view on the
scalability of such arrangements.
> Benefit: I gain low latency transit to most everyone.
>
> Drawback: It is technically challenging to create an automate
> system to regionalize and create appropriate filter lists.
It also complicates every peering relationship and multi-homed
customer connection, as you have to worry about both multiple
external AS's and your internal routing redistribution from all
of these regional routing clouds.
If you presume a fairly dense set of interconnects among transit
providers, then you're not going to get a significant improvement
in latency despite the added complexity.
/John
More information about the NANOG
mailing list