CIDR
Steven K. Widmayer
skw
Tue Mar 15 03:16:19 UTC 1994
>Jessica
>Do we still propagate through the Internet the individual network
>numbers associated with these routes ?
>
> Yakov: I believe it is still the case at the moment (test and
> trial stage). If anyone, at this point, replaced its classful routes
> with an aggregate route, please speak up.
>
> --Jessica
>
>
>
Jessica,
I can tell you about a case last week where I encouraged Sprint to only
configure the aggregate with NSFNET for 199.44.0/17, rather than the
128 separate routes. Though I don't see the route in the NSFNET routing
tables yet, so I assume they are not announcing it yet. Also, perhaps
this isn't a good idea, since the gist of this conversation indicates
we are still in the testing phase?
--Steve Widmayer
More information about the NANOG
mailing list