[Nanog-futures] Transition update

[kris foster]

On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:57 AM, Joe Abley wrote:

> 
> On 2010-06-09, at 07:08, Sean Figgins wrote:
> 
>> I would think that there may also me less apprehension if as part of 
>> incorporating, THIS SC was disbanded, and a new election was held for 
>> the new board of directors.  We certainly should reward all the hard 
>> work that it takes make this happen, but anything that THIS SC does, 
>> should not mean automatic entitlement to some type of corporate royal 
>> status.
> 
> If the replacement schedule for board members of NANOG, Inc. matched the existing replacement schedule for the SC, I don't see why any extraordinary measures would be called for.
> 
> We're assuming that the NANOG, Inc. board has the same members as the SC, of course, which I don't remember hearing in any public context.

This along with some other information pertaining to the incorporation was silently posted to newnog.org.

Kris