[Nanog-futures] Conference Network Experiment policy

Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Fri Apr 10 00:48:17 UTC 2009



Martin Hannigan wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Provo <nanog-fut at rsuc.gweep.net
> <mailto:nanog-fut at rsuc.gweep.net>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     Thanks for the feedback - please do keep it coming!  We'll pop out
>     an updated draft to reflect the concensus when some equilibrium is
>     reached, but just to comment on some of the questions and points
>     raised so far (both on-list and off):
> 
> 
>     - Costs were intended to be covered under the "Have finite and
>      well-defined requirements for support [...]" (WRT static/sunk
>      costs of labour, etc) and "a statement regarding resources the
>      proposer is committing to supply" (WRT money or specific equipment
>      needed for the experiment).  The draft will be updated to make
>      both more explict.
>     - 
> 
> 
> 
> It would be interesting to suggest that a copy of all raw data collected
> to be provided back to the community so that they too could share in the
> research or create derivatives from it (with proper attribution for all
> work product of course).

As a goal that's exactly the opposite of how we've done it in the past.
not sure that it's necessarily a bad idea, just saying.

> Best,
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> --
> Martin Hannigan                               martin at theicelandguy.com
> <mailto:martin at theicelandguy.com>
> p: +16178216079
> Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures at nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures



More information about the Nanog-futures mailing list