[Nanog-futures] An opinion re:issues with heavy-handed moderation
ge at linuxbox.org
Tue Apr 7 20:35:31 UTC 2009
Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> As former Chair of the MLC, let me point out that getting MLC members
> to actually deal with moderating people who are actively being a pain
> in the ass is highly difficult, let alone preemptive moderation that
> requires more or less constant attention. This is not a reflection on
> the current make-up of the MLC, it is just human nature to not take
> action until the pain is actually *bad*, particularly in volunteer
> organizations where stuff is mostly-working-OK.
I should have pointed out earlier that my problem is not with the MLC
moderating or doing their jobs. Much like those who spoke against my
position, I am in favour.
My issue is with visibility and documentation of this process.
> I'll also join others in observing that we don't see any evidence of
> preemptive moderation of those whom many of us fervently wish would
> receive same.
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures at nanog.org
More information about the Nanog-futures