[Nanog-futures] An opinion re:issues with heavy-handed moderation
jrhett at netconsonance.com
Tue Apr 7 16:57:12 UTC 2009
This message is intended for Joe Provo and other members of the
steering committee. I am not replying to Gadi.
On Apr 6, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> 1. Threads are moderated with no notice to person or mailing
> list, or availability for examination.
I have been moderated on the list recently. I received notice that I
was moderated, and on consideration of the topic I agreed with the
moderation. Honestly there should be more moderation rather than
> 3. It is very heavy-handed high-key moderation, which is not
> what we ask for on NANOG as far as I understand, unless there
> was a policy change.
It has been what I've been hoping for ;-) So it is certain why *I* ask
> 5. The admin team does not respond to requests for information
> or challenges on this matter (I made one).
I don't know about recently, but a year or so ago I replied to a
notice that my post was rejected and I got a detailed answer in
response. That answer satisfied my curiosity, and even though I
didn't agree entirely with the decision it was a "close enough" call
anyway. I don't have any problem with the process as I have
witnessed it. If it is still being handled in this fashion then I see
no need for change.
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
More information about the Nanog-futures