[Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?

Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Thu Feb 28 20:05:26 UTC 2008


Martin Hannigan wrote:
>>  >> It's distracting when the speaker
>>  >> gets verbal time warnings(not anyones fault, it just is). Time ticks are
>>  >> needed, but there's a better way to do it, methinks.
>>  >
> 
> [ clip ]
> 
>>  When I mc part of the program, I have a powerpoint slide deck with 10 5
>>  and 1 minute markers which I place in the plane of view of the speaker
>>  at the appropriate moments. Not sure if the lightning talks speakers
>>  appreciate that but monday 12:00-13:00 ran smoothly.
> 
> 
> Thanks for sticking your computer in front of us while we're talking?

I knew I could count on a contrarian opinion from someplace...

Personally I've found it less intrusive than poking the speaker or using 
hand gestures...

> The point is that something non obtrusive would be better. The soft
> lighting of cue lights seems "less" intrusive, but they sure are damn
> expensive. I think I'll swing by Radio Shack and see if I can rig up a
> system for < $10 + 9v.

Alternate attempts at improvisation are of course welcome... ;)

> 
> -M<
> 




More information about the Nanog-futures mailing list