[Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?
Joel Jaeggli
joelja at bogus.com
Thu Feb 28 20:05:26 UTC 2008
Martin Hannigan wrote:
>> >> It's distracting when the speaker
>> >> gets verbal time warnings(not anyones fault, it just is). Time ticks are
>> >> needed, but there's a better way to do it, methinks.
>> >
>
> [ clip ]
>
>> When I mc part of the program, I have a powerpoint slide deck with 10 5
>> and 1 minute markers which I place in the plane of view of the speaker
>> at the appropriate moments. Not sure if the lightning talks speakers
>> appreciate that but monday 12:00-13:00 ran smoothly.
>
>
> Thanks for sticking your computer in front of us while we're talking?
I knew I could count on a contrarian opinion from someplace...
Personally I've found it less intrusive than poking the speaker or using
hand gestures...
> The point is that something non obtrusive would be better. The soft
> lighting of cue lights seems "less" intrusive, but they sure are damn
> expensive. I think I'll swing by Radio Shack and see if I can rig up a
> system for < $10 + 9v.
Alternate attempts at improvisation are of course welcome... ;)
>
> -M<
>
More information about the Nanog-futures
mailing list