[Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 03:33:11 UTC 2008


Joel spewed:

>I think it would be remiss of the pc to not review the status of
>program elements. That would be an abrogation of the >responsibility
invested the pc by the charter.

>Further I believe that PC review of a popular and successful >program
element would be with the goal of helping it grow.


Can we see the procedure that you're going to make up to do this first?


-M<



More information about the Nanog-futures mailing list