[Nanog-futures] level of fail [was: The Peering BOF and the Fallout?]

David Barak thegameiam at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 26 06:58:55 UTC 2008






--- On Tue, 2/26/08, vijay gill <vgill at vijaygill.com> wrote:
> > > Removing the BOF and or turning it into some sort
> of overtly structured
> > > environment would make it boring and not as
> useful, which is bad.
> >
> >
> > then i suggest you not do it!
> 
> 
> 
> I am very against any such action. I wish to state for the
> record that I do
> NOT want oversight of the bof, the very spontaneity is what
> brings out the
> true value for me

This is the most violent agreement I've ever seen.

David Barak
Need Geek Rock?  Try The Franchise: 
http://www.listentothefranchise.com


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 




More information about the Nanog-futures mailing list