[Nanog-futures] level of fail [was: The Peering BOF and the Fallout?]
vijay gill
vgill at vijaygill.com
Tue Feb 26 06:05:48 UTC 2008
On 2/25/08, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>
> > Removing the BOF and or turning it into some sort of overtly structured
> > environment would make it boring and not as useful, which is bad.
>
>
> then i suggest you not do it!
I am very against any such action. I wish to state for the record that I do
NOT want oversight of the bof, the very spontaneity is what brings out the
true value for me
/vijay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-futures/attachments/20080225/2aa9ae40/attachment.htm
More information about the Nanog-futures
mailing list