[Nanog-futures] List Transistion

[Sean Figgins]

Lynda wrote:
> John Payne wrote:
> 
>> Heh, just reread the message.  It's actually not clear that you  
>> aren't doing the import.
>>
>> Sorry about the noise.... clarification requested.
> 
> I think that Betty et al might want to consider a follow up message. I 
> misread this as well, John. Until you commented, I thought that it meant 
> I'd have to sign up again, which didn't make much sense to me. We will 
> not be the only two to misunderstand, I suspect.

Although it WOULD be an interesting exercise to understand how many 
people actually read NANOG.  I suspect it is significantly less than the 
often touted 9000+ subscribers.  Of course John is right, the Mailman 
software will happily unsubscribe any list members that bounce, but that 
won't address the subscribers taht either delete/discard the nanog mail, 
or file it into a folder for later follow up.

I filter nanog mail off to another folder, and go in every so often to 
see what's going on, but only really read -futures regularly.

I did not see what the new sender address is going to be.  That would be 
a helpful clarification for those of us that have whitelists.

  -Sean