[Nanog-futures] Cisco outage
Robert E. Seastrom
rs at seastrom.com
Thu Nov 29 15:00:39 UTC 2007
David Barak <thegameiam at yahoo.com> writes:
> Marty's interpretation of the AUP (that it governs mail between an
> MLC member and a list subscriber, whether or not it traverses
> Merit's servers) is not universal, and is currently hotly debated on
> the admin list. I for one do not share his interpretation. I
> expect that this will be sorted out soon, and we'll post a note with
> the outcome either way.
It is completely unclear to me how he could have arrived at this
interpretation unless he's working from a materially different version
of the AUP than the one posted at http://www.nanog.org/aup.html
---rob (ex-mlc, no hat, no hair)
More information about the Nanog-futures
mailing list