[Nanog-futures] Cisco outage
joelja at bogus.com
Wed Nov 28 18:38:43 UTC 2007
Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Not for the content. Randy is a little excitable since he and the SC
> have been marginalized for the most part. AUP Item #8 seems to apply.
> I'm asking if it's what people really want.
I'm prepared to pull the cord on the suicde belt in hopes that I can
take the current mlc committee with me. This is the silliest rathole
we've gone down since the construct was created.
> Nanog-futures mailing list
> Nanog-futures at nanog.org
More information about the Nanog-futures