[Nanog-futures] Cisco outage

[David Barak]

--- On Wed, 11/28/07, Todd Underwood <todd-nanogfutures at docforge.org> wrote:

> From: Todd Underwood <todd-nanogfutures at docforge.org>
> Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Cisco outage
> To: nanog-futures at nanog.org
> Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2007, 1:54 PM
> > >
> > > It seems to be a cut and dried case of "mail
> bouncing".  If mail
> > > bounces, the address is "not good" and
> should be removed.
> 
> no.  if mail *from* the list bounces, the address should be
> removed.
> if you bounce all the mail from everyone else in the world,
> it's
> unrelated.  
> 
> > Not for the content. Randy is a little excitable since
> he and the SC
> > have been marginalized for the most part. AUP Item #8
> seems to apply.
> > I'm asking if it's what people really want.
> 
> it's not what i want.
> 
> does anyone else (aside from marty) actually think that AUP
> applies to
> mail between list members?  this just seems silly.  the
> poster may
> violate the AUP for some other reason, but having an
> account that
> bounces email from marty's choice of smtp provider
> certainly doesn't
> qualify.

I do not share Marty's interpretation.   

David Barak
Need Geek Rock?  Try The Franchise: 
http://www.listentothefranchise.com



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs